Misconceptions and Truths: Understanding Student Due Process

Table of Contents

Due process refers to the rights and procedures that individuals should be granted ,and the government should respect, when facing potential deprivation of life, liberty, or property.

Due Process in educational setting ensures that students are treated fairly, especially when facing disciplinary actions that might significantly impact their academic journey.

There are various myths and misconceptions surrounding student due process. Addressing and debunking these provides a better understanding of students’ rights and the responsibilities of educational institutions. Here are some common misconceptions and the truths behind them:


​Misconception Reality
Student due process can only be applied in cases of expulsion or long-term suspension. While these severe disciplinary actions definitely trigger due process rights, even lesser disciplinary actions can necessitate certain due process considerations, especially if they significantly impact a student’s educational experience. This may include short- term suspension, behavioral contracts and loss of privileges.
Private institutions are not bound to due process principles. While private institutions aren’t directly governed by the Constitution in the same way public schools are, they’re still bound to their own stated policies and contractual obligations. Furthermore, they must comply with Title IX procedures if they receive federal funds.
In disciplinary hearings, students always have the right to legal representation in. ​The right to legal representation varies depending on the institution and the severity of the disciplinary action. While legal representation might be allowed, it’s not consistently assured.
​Due process indicates that the school should prove the student’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. ​The “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard is typically used in criminal trials, while in the educational sector, a “preponderance of the evidence” (more likely than not) or “clear and convincing evidence” is more commonly used.
Informal resolutions, like mediation, are often a better and gentler choice for students. ​Informal resolutions can be a good option in certain circumstances, but not always the best route. While informal resolutions can be effective in certain situations, they’re not always the best route. It’s important to fully understand the implications of each option.
Due process procedures lean towards the accused in cases of sexual misconduct, leaving victims unprotected. ​The core foundation of due process is ensuring fairness for all parties involved. In Title IX cases, due process protects the rights of both the accuser and the accused, especially the recent changes on due process which keeps this into consideration.
K-12 students and college students have the same due process rights. ​Due process procedures can be significantly different based on age, maturity and educational setting. While procedures for K-12 students might include more parental involvement and protections customized to their age, college students face more complex procedures due to their adulthood.


Scroll to Top